🔗 Share this article

Europe experienced widespread relief on Monday, as the diplomatic emergency triggered by the introduction of a new 28-article proposal for resolving the conflict appeared – momentarily – to have been contained. A Washington representative spoke of "notable headway" after diplomatic discussions in Geneva. On Monday night, Moscow made its countermove: an extensive attack of aerial bombardment on Kyiv.

The Rhythm of Negotiation and Warfare

The chain of opposing developments captured the harsh reality of the outgoing year. By day, political struggles are conducted: hopeful statements are delivered from different nations. Considerable effort is expended on containing certain initiatives. By night, Russian leadership brutally reminds the world that, for them, war remains the key method for achieving "peace".

Nighttime Reality

As the offensive unfolded into the early hours of Tuesday, the immediate reality of Ukraine's exposure was exposed. Ukraine is able to track missile launches from Russian territory, a capacity afforded by timely intelligence. From witness perspectives, Ukrainian air force fighter jets that had been deployed to intercept incoming cruise missiles flew past – modern combat jets supplied to Ukraine by Western partners.

Shortly after, Kyiv's air-defence systems engaged: defensive missiles fired to intercept a Russian ballistic missile. This was a sophisticated defense system at work, presumably delivered by Western nations. Every deployment shakes the surroundings, shaking the windows. The instant of fear quickly becomes sober acceptance: perhaps the incoming missile won't strike its target this time, sparing the city from ruin and further power outages.

Persistent Threats

Not long after, a large-caliber weapon engaged a unmanned aircraft close by, part of a mobile-fire group – almost certainly Western-made equipment. Sadly, the shots failed to hit the enemy aircraft – it continued its flight toward its objective.

With pauses, this persisted until dawn. Kyiv greeted the daybreak reports: seven people killed, devastation and infrastructure problems in multiple buildings as a result of the nocturnal offensive. As always, everyone still continued their routines – enduring hostilities. But those entire period demonstrated Ukraine's critical military reliance on international aid – a need that regional partners are demonstrably unable to fill in the near term.

Ineffective Peace Efforts

The comprehensive proposal from US administration provoked deep reactions, discussion and serious worry – and temporarily diverted attention from Ukraine's major integrity crisis in years. Yet, we have experienced comparable situations, after prior negotiation attempts and international summits.

Every new approach from American administration adheres to the same pattern: a diplomatic cavalry charge against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with allied governments, manages to fend off. They manage the tension but never actually secure success. This pattern will, certainly, persist.

Political Considerations

It is tempting to accuse specific actors of consistently pushing Moscow's conditions. But that does not seem to be the entire situation. US administration functions according to a principle well known to experienced diplomats: you cannot secure via talks what you have lost on the battlefield. The White House assumes that it is unrealistic to compel Moscow to surrender the areas that it currently occupies in Ukraine's occupied territories.

The problem is that while accepting these circumstances, US leadership does minimal to deter Moscow, through diplomacy or military means, from thinking that the status quo will not evolve additionally in its benefit in the months ahead.

Opposing Positions

Therefore, the Kremlin is confident that time is on his side – that Ukraine and its allies are nearing depletion. Their reason to sign a deal that does not give them the greatest potential benefit is almost completely absent. There may be numerous efforts to achieve ceasefire, but they will persist as long as Russia's leader remains supremely confident in the result.

On the contrary, Ukrainian leadership believes that Ukraine can still persist, gradually sacrificing civilians and areas but averting a total frontline collapse until conditions improve in its favour.

Existing Situation

Objectively, there are no genuine requirements for a truce. Now, subjective factors are becoming relevant: political desires to mediate resolution and obtain worldwide acknowledgment, and Kyiv's double obstacles – on one hand, not to estrange crucial supporters, and on the other, to mobilize citizens around the national cause against any plan Kyiv finds unacceptable, so that their focus does not shift toward homefront challenges. And although their task will now be significantly challenging after latest incidents, it remains quite doubtful that this will change their overall approach.

These two forces are influencing discussions.

Conclusion and Outlook

It took a mere seven days to terminate the 28 points of the current initiative. Forceful and unpredictable management of the matter by Washington, resistance by Ukraine and the other European countries, along with soothing efforts of representatives, and finally, current information leaks, all did their job.

While new proposals based on previous concepts are forthcoming, Kyiv, London and other allied nations should draw one fundamental conclusion: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to counter political attacks from Washington that are based on Russian demands and show certain reluctance to modify developments, if they remain united and strengthen their defence capabilities at a considerably quicker tempo. If they do, neither external pressure nor military threats will be able to break them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capability to repel nightly air assaults will, for the predictable period, primarily depend on sustained allied backing.