🔗 Share this article

An activist group has claimed to have scraped millions of tracks from the popular streaming service and is getting ready to publish them online.

Possible Impetus for Artificial Intelligence Development

Observers said the seeming leak could boost artificial intelligence firms searching for material to train their models.

An entity called Anna’s Archive reported it had scraped 86 million music files from the platform and 256 million entries of associated data such as artist and album names. Spotify, which hosts more than 100 million tracks, confirmed that the breach did not constitute its entire inventory.

“We have located and disabled the malicious user accounts that were involved in illegal scraping,” stated a Spotify representative.

The Swedish company, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, added that an investigation into unauthorised access found a third party scraped public metadata and employed illicit methods to circumvent DRM protections.

Archive's Stated Mission and Concerns

The streaming service does not believe the music taken by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for providing links to copyright-infringing books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

The group claimed the audio files represented 99.6% of all music streamed to by its listeners and would be shared via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a means of sharing large data files online.

“Of course the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great beginning,” said Anna’s Archive, which frames its mission as “preserving humanity’s knowledge and culture”.

AI Training and Intellectual Property Battleground

A composer and campaigner for protecting artists’ rights, said the leaked music would likely be utilized for developing artificial intelligence systems.

“Training on illegally sourced material is unfortunately widespread in the tech sector, so this stolen music is highly likely to be used training AI models,” he said.

The Anna’s Archive site alludes to a large online archive, a vast online repository of pirated books that has allegedly been used by Meta to train its systems.

A founder of an artificial intelligence company wrote on LinkedIn that members of the public could in principle “create their own private free version of Spotify”. He added it could also enable technology firms to “train on contemporary music at a large volume”.

Intellectual property law has emerged as a battleground between artists, authors and creatives on one side and AI companies on the other.

Government Considerations and Responses

Across Britain, creative professionals have raised concerns against a ministerial proposal to allow AI companies utilize copyright-protected work without consent unless the owner opts out. Virtually every participant to a government call for evidence on the proposal has backed artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for technology, research and technology informed parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the matter, adding that ministers would “take the time to get this correct”. The administration has pledged to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by next year.